建議於《香港人權與民主法》定義「港奸」 (文:王岸然)

Share This:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

pic via wikicommons by Kevin McCoy under CC2.0

已經寫文章為大家介紹過,美國國會將立的 《香港人權與民主法》中,是有黑名單制度的,美國政府會凍結名單上的人在美國的資產,拒絕此人及其家人入境美國,已有的簽證亦可取消,這都是已經寫在草案中的內容。

但草案中用的字眼簡單,只說要針對傷害香港人自由人權的人。定義過於廣泛,也無舉報制度,具體運作之後可能只是美國政府説了算數,這樣並不妥善。

所以我建議港人在一人一信寫給美國國㑹,要求盡早立法之餘,信中加上你認為甚麼港人應當被制裁,即是為「港奸」下一個你的定義。下面是我將會寫給美國議員的建議,可供大家參考採用。我的原則是港奸只應針對實踐有害港人自由的行為的人,不可包括只是發表意見的人,因為這是言論自由。

⋯⋯
I also note that there is no definition for who is “the Persons Responsible” (we commonly refer such persons as “Hong Kong Traitors”) in this Act;as referred to in SEC.7. Hong Kong Traitors should be those persons responsible for the violation in connection with the exercise of right of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, and freedom of religion of the resident in Hong Kong.

I hereby suggest the term ” Hong Kong Traitor ” be added in the Act to qualify who are the ” Persons Responsible ” for deprivation of the said freedom of Hong Kong Citizens.

The term Hong Kong Traitors referred in the Act should include, but not limited to, the following kinds of Responsible Persons:

1. The Chief Executive of Hong Kong and his/her Executive Council Members, are prima facie responsible for any law or government action unless the contrary is proved. Eg, individuals have voiced out publicly for dissenting opinions.

2. Legislators of the Legislative Council passing law that is injurious to the Human Rights of the Hong Kong Citizen, eg Law under Article 23 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong.

3. Any one holding an Official Public Duty or Memebers of any official Consultative Committees. University top officials or known scholars who speak out to support government acts which is injurious to human rights in Hong Kong.

4. Know Media or Commentators who has, by reliable information, or classified intelligence, by the US government, received pecuniary benefits for advocating opinions in the public adversive to the interest of Hong Kong Citizens with Human Rights Violations in particular.

Whenever there is a joint written petition letter with sensible sound reasons from 3000 Hong Kong Citizens complaining who should be classify as Hong Kong Traitors, the President of the United States, after proper investigation, should also classify them in the list as ” Persons Responsible ” as referred to in SEC 7 of this Act.

Best Regards, and looking forward to your reply.

聯署信中文版(曾焯文譯):⋯⋯
在下又注意到,此法案中並無界定誰是「須負責人」(我們通常將此類人士稱為「香港叛徒」):如SEC.7所述。香港叛徒當關乎違反香港居民行使言論、新聞自由、集會自由、結社自由和宗教自由。

在下於是建議法令加入「香港叛徒」一詞,以界定誰人須為剝奪上述香港公民自由而負責。

法案所提及的「香港叛徒」一詞應包括但不限於以下各類須負責的人:

一.除非相反證據成立,否則香港行政長官及其行政會議成員之任何法律或政府行為,均視作表面證供己確立,而須負責。例如,個人已公開對異見出聲。

二.立法會議員通過有損香港市民人權的法例,例如香港基本法第二十三條。

三.任何法定諮詢委員會成員或公職人員。大學高級職員或知名學者,支持政府損害香港人權的行為。

四.傳媒媒或評論員,根據美國政府可靠訊息或機密情報,獲得金錢利益,以公開主張意見,違反香港市民利益,尤其是侵犯人權行為。

只要有三千位香港市民聯署請願信,基於合理理由,申訴誰應歸類為香港叛徒,美國總統經過適當調查,亦當將這些香港叛徒列入作「須負責人」名單。如本法案第七條所述。
_____________________________________________

我會參考大家留言後修改上述定義,在適當時間出信給美國國會議員。但我希望所有人皆明白,坐言起行丶直接行動丶一人一信的重要性,自己香港自己救,不要等政客救你。

有幾千人寫信,一定有效,得我一封,美議員就只會睬你生芒果而已。

岸仔上

(註:題目由編輯修訂,原題目為:大家集思廣益,建議為《香港人權與民主法》內下「港奸」的定義


Share This:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments